Another day another couple of approaches

Rather than isolate items within the frame or imbue the image was false values of movement (as some of my earlier work has done this week) I placed some kit into a plastic container and shot through it. I then experimented with different processing approaches – high key, high contrast, warm etc and liked some of the effects.

Intimate Landscape V3 (2 of 7) Intimate Landscape V3 (4 of 7)
Intimate Landscape V3 (3 of 7) Intimate Landscape V3 (6 of 7)
Intimate Landscape V3 (5 of 7) Intimate Landscape V3 (1 of 7)
Intimate Landscape V3 (7 of 7) Intimate Landscape V3a (2 of 6)
Intimate Landscape V3a (1 of 6) Intimate Landscape V3a (6 of 6)
Intimate Landscape V3a (5 of 6) Intimate Landscape V3a (4 of 6)

Thoughts
I think these images, particularly the  softer abstract ones invite the viewer to consider what they are looking at and I could see such an image produced to a really large scale so that these small things overwhelm the viewer and this would produce a rather dominant effect that could work to offer them something of how feel the burden of having to use this kit day in and day out. However while a single individual image works well I can’t really see the approach having any sustainability. If I used such an image it will need to be within the context of a wider deeper discourse otherwise it is a bit random.

I then went on to apply a similar approach to some kit – see below – but the same criticism applies in that a single image might work by offering the viewer an insight into my world but a series just either repeats, and may even muddy the evocation when subject to radically different processing.

 Intimate Landscape V4 (6 of 12)  Intimate Landscape V4 (8 of 12)
 Intimate Landscape V4 (7 of 12)Intimate Landscape V4 (9 of 12)  Intimate Landscape V4 (1 of 12)Intimate Landscape V4 (10 of 12)
 Intimate Landscape V4 (11 of 12) Intimate Landscape V4 (5 of 12)
Intimate Landscape V4 (12 of 12) Intimate Landscape V4 (4 of 12)

These are poor approaches and don’t work at all. I don’t think it’s because I am unclear about what I want the images to say (compression, isolation, anomie, burden, all documented) but how I can say it in a way that is visually engaging. The photos by themselves offer different levels of visual interest but would need to be shown in association with other imagery to activate their relevance. Shown like this in isolation they just don’t work. 

Advertisements

About anomiepete

South Londoner struggling with life, art and photography.
This entry was posted in Project 4: Intimate Landscapes and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s