MA Project proposal version 4

Here is my revised project proposal. I think its pretty much set now.

Old working title: Seen unseen: disability re-presented

New working Title: Paralysis
Comment: I have changed the working title from Seen unseen: disability re-presented because I want the title to draw people in and so need to use established conventions to do that. The previous title was too abstract.

Old research question: why do people see selectively?

New research question: how can I 1) express how I feel and 2) challenge ableist hegemony in the visual representation of disability?

Comment: the new question is much more focussed as specific than the old.

Aims and Objectives:
The rise of digital technologies and the resulting explosion of imagery produced and shared, may suggest to the casual observer that all subject matter is being represented from a variety of points of view (Cooper Smith, 2013, Etherington, 2014). Yet that this is not the case. Disability is represented, but in ways that does not reflect my and other’s personal experience (Garland-Thomson, 2002). Accordingly I want to explore, understand and challenge dominant visual representations of disability through my work and present a body of work that represents my experience and outlook as a disabled man.

The process will allow me to explore and extend my own artistic repertoire. Accordingly my project aims are to:

Aim 1: Explore how to evoke specific understanding of disability

Aim 2: Experiment and develop my own visual artistic repertoire and ability to articulate through digital imagery

In order to achieve the above I will need to meet the following objectives.

        1. Explore the photographic representation of disability and impairment
        2. Experiment using different digital visual forms to express myself
        3. Locate my work in terms of artistic perspectives and context
        4. Produce a body of work
        5. Exhibit a body of work that meets the aims

These objectives will be achieved through my learning to blog and exploiting the power of the internet as an artistic and research portal. Much of my life is lived online and so it seems fitting that I aim to study and explore these issues though this medium.

Visual meanings are subject to many forces and while images are static their meanings change (Barthes, 1981, p65) because they are subject to many forces such as context (Gombrich, 1960) economics (Solomon-Godeau, 1991, p4-27), cultural fashions (Coleman, 1998, p91-112) and technology (Paul 2003). Accordingly there are three key contextual points of reference I will need to address in order to meet my aims and objectives.

Firstly, I will need to explore how visual meaning is transmitted and received in terms of the visual representation of disability. This will involve considering how the issue is represented in terms of its theoretical, historical, social and cultural, contexts.

Secondly I will need to consider the above in relation to the contemporary context (Tag 2003, Tse, 2014). This will involve considering my experience as a disabled person in terms of psychology, location, community context and a range of other factors, such as contemporary photographic theory as well as identifying any current themes in the representation of disability and impairment, and also looking at connotation in terms of others such as Black people, women and gays, to see how meaning is created by visual representation for them (Guy, 2014 p16-21, Shakespeare, 2002).

Thirdly I will need to compare and contrast my experience with other disabled photographers and consider the similarities and differences between our approaches and work and determine why that may be.

Lastly, I will need to explore how contexts affect visual connotation in order to understand how best to present my work so that viewers engage with it.

This approach will allow me to both locate my work in terms of artistic practice and social context and inform my approach to representation of my experience.

The research method reflects my time and place: it will be qualitative in approach and be primary based on action research – practice based experiments in visual articulation through a series of projects that explore my experience and viewpoint. I will then locate my approaches against other historical and contemporary practitioners work and consider the evocations.

I will also carry out contextual secondary research, principally in the form of a literature review, where I will locate where my approaches sit in terms of social and cultural history – specifically those areas mentioned under Context.

My blog will be the place I record the process and trials. This will act both as a record and so allow for reflection, but will also allow for engagement with, and feedback from, others as I have 140 people following my blog at this time (April 2015).

In addition I will learn about blogging and online presence more generally to develop both my blog and website in order to show work in progress and completed projects, including physical objects – as and when these are finalised.

The outcomes of my project will be threefold: firstly there will be a completed research paper that will have informed my exploration and final approach to the development of a body of work. Secondly there will be a body of work represented in the MA exhibition and online that will have been informed by the research and approaches to photography based in phototherapy (Demarre, 2001) and activist art education (Emme, 2001). Thirdly, and most importantly, the process should produce new understandings and self awareness that will inform my continuing and future artistic practice.

Work Plan:
My workplan is based on weekly practice and experimentation. My approach is to generate work while exploring it in relation to its context – historical, contemporary and artistic – and engaging with fellow MA participants and other artistic bloggers.

Term 1 – finding my personal  voice again

Public landscape

Domestic landscapes

Out of Place

Intimate landscapes



Term 2 Gaining clarity

Urine bags






Bar codes





Term 3


Term 4

Projects and research paper

Term 5

Curation – my MA thematic imagery curated and arranged into its original products

Production – getting ready for the exhibition – production values

Term 6

Getting ready for the exhibition



The formal paper is located on the Project Proposals page here.



Barthes R. (1981, 2000 edn) Camera Lucida, by Vintage

Coleman A. D. (1998) Conspicuous By His Absence: Concerning The Mysterious Disappearance Of William Mortensen in Depth of Field: Essays on Photography, Mass Media, and Lens Culture,University of New Mexico Press

Demarre L. (2001) Phototherapy: Traveling Beyond Categories. Afterimage The Journal of Media Arts and Cultural Criticism, 29(3), pp. 6.

Emme M. (2001) Visuality in teaching and research: Activist art education, in Studies in Art Education, Vol 43, p57-74, National Art Education Association

Etherington D. (2014) Flickr At 10: 1M Photos Shared Per Day, 170% Increase Since Making 1TB Free, Available at: [Accessed on 26/10/2014]

Garland-Thomson R. (2002) The Politics of Staring: Visual Rhetorics of Disability in Popular Photography in Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, Snyder S, Brueggemann B, and Garland-Thomson R (eds), Modern Language Association of America

Gombrich E. H. (1960, 1987 fifth edn) Art and Illusion: A study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, Phadion Press

Gorse N. (08.10.2004) Research Methods Available at: [Accessed on 26/10/2014]

Guy L. (2014) Queer in Practice, The Photographic Review Issue 79, published by Photoworks North, Summer 2014

Paul C. (2003) Digital Art, Thames and Hudson

Shakespeare T. (2002) The social model of disability: an outdated ideology? In ‘Research in Social Science and Disability’ Volume 2, pp. 9-28

Smith C. (2013) Facebook Users Are Uploading 350 Million New Photos Each Day, Business Insider, Available at: [Accessed on 25/10/2014]

Solomon-Godeau A. (1991) Photography at the Dock, University of Minnesota Press

Tag J. (2003) Evidence, Truth and Order: Photographic Records and the Growth of the State in The Photography Reader, Liz Wells (ed), Routledge

Tse J. (2014) What It Means to be Seen: Photography and Queer Visibility, The Scope at Ryerson, Available at: [Accessed on 26/10/2014]

About Pete

South Londoner struggling with life, art and photography.
This entry was posted in Proposals, Tutorials, Symposiums, and Term Reviews and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s